Nokia Asha 302 Nokia Asha 302
Nokia 301 Nokia 301
VS

Comparision Nokia Asha 302 vs Nokia 301

Nokia Asha 302

WINNER
Nokia Asha 302

Rating: 4 points
Nokia 301

Nokia 301

Rating: 4 points
Grade
Nokia Asha 302
Nokia 301
Performance
0
0
Display
2
2
Camera
0
0
Battery
1
1
Other
1
1
Main characteristics
5
6
Audio
10
10
Interfaces and communications
2
2

Top specs and features

Main camera resolution

Nokia Asha 302: 3 MP Nokia 301: 3 MP

Battery capacity

Nokia Asha 302: 1320 mAh Nokia 301: 1200 mAh

Pixel density per screen inch

Nokia Asha 302: 168 ppi Nokia 301: 166 ppi

Display size

Nokia Asha 302: 2.4 " Nokia 301: 2.4 "

RAM

Nokia Asha 302: 0.12 GB Nokia 301: 0.64 GB

Description

Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Nokia Asha 302 scored There is no data points. Nokia 301 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.

Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia Asha 302 3 MP, versus 3 MP for Nokia 301. Main camera aperture at Nokia Asha 302 f/There is no data. At Nokia 301 aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a There is no data flash, the second one has a There is no data flash.

The resolution of the front camera for the first device is There is no data MP vs. There is no data MP for Nokia 301. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.

Performance comparison. Nokia Asha 302 has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. There is no data is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Nokia Asha 302 has 0.12 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.

Nokia 301 is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the There is no data kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 0.64 GB of RAM. RAM version for Nokia 301 DDRThere is no data.

Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia Asha 302 scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Nokia 301 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.

Comparison of displays. On board Nokia Asha 302 installed TFT screen matrix. The display resolution is 2.4 inches. The pixel density reaches 168dpi screen.

Nokia Asha 302's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².

Nokia 301 has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 2.4 inches. Here the pixel density is 166 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².

Equipment and general characteristics. Nokia Asha 302 came out in There is no data. Nokia 301 submitted There is no data.

The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.

Nokia Asha 302 supports up to There is no data sim cards, versus 2 for Nokia 301.

Nokia Asha 302 weighs 106 grams, versus 102 grams for Nokia 301. The thickness of the first smartphone is 13.9 mm, versus 12.5 mm for the second one.

Nokia Asha 302 has USB version 2 and Nokia 301 has got There is no data USB version. The first smartphone is running There is no data version of Android. The second device has the There is no data version of Android installed. Nokia Asha 302 is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Nokia 301 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.

The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.

Why Nokia Asha 302 is better than Nokia 301

  • Battery capacity 1320 mAh против 1200 mAh, more on 10%
  • Pixel density per screen inch 168 ppi против 166 ppi, more on 1%

Nokia Asha 302 vs Nokia 301: highlights

Nokia Asha 302
Nokia Asha 302
Nokia 301
Nokia 301
Performance
RAM
The more RAM you have, the more apps and processes you can run at the same time without lag or performance degradation.
0.12 GB
max 18
Average: 2.8 GB
0.64 GB
max 18
Average: 2.8 GB
Processor configuration
1 ядро 1 GHz
There is no data
Memory card
microSDHC
microSDHC
Cumulative memory
0.1
max 1024
Average:
0.25
max 1024
Average:
Process technology
The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.
45 nm
Average: 22.9 nm
nm
Average: 22.9 nm
Display
Pixel density per screen inch
The higher the density of pixels per inch, the sharper and more detailed the image will be displayed on the screen. The high pixel density creates smoother edges and sharper details. Show more
168 ppi
max 848
Average: 296.2 ppi
166 ppi
max 848
Average: 296.2 ppi
Display size
Image perception depends on the screen size. The bigger, the better.
2.4 "
max 10.1
Average: 5.1 "
2.4 "
max 10.1
Average: 5.1 "
Screen resolution
The higher the screen resolution, the more detailed and clear the image can be seen. However, screen resolution is not the only factor affecting image quality. Factors such as screen type, brightness, contrast, and color reproduction are also important. Show more
320 x 240 px
240 x 320
Screen Matrix
There are various types of screen matrices such as IPS, AMOLED, TFT and others. IPS screens provide wide viewing angles and good color accuracy. AMOLED screens have richer colors, deeper blacks and lower power consumption. TFT screens usually offer a more affordable price but may have limited viewing angles and less accurate color reproduction. Show more
TFT
TFT
Aspect Ratio
4:3
4:3
Camera
Main camera resolution
The higher the resolution of the main camera, the more detailed and clear photos and videos can be. However, resolution is not the only factor affecting image quality. Optics quality, pixel size, light sensitivity and other factors are also important. Show more
3 MP
max 200
Average: 14.2 MP
3 MP
max 200
Average: 14.2 MP
Video recording (main camera)
480 x 15
240 x 30
Battery
Battery capacity
The larger the battery capacity, the longer the smartphone can work without recharging.
1320 mAh
max 22000
Average: 3090.7 mAh
1200 mAh
max 22000
Average: 3090.7 mAh
Removable battery
Available
Available
Talk time
10
max 97
Average: 12.4
18
max 97
Average: 12.4
Standby time
29
max 75
Average: 17.4
37
max 75
Average: 17.4
Other
Main characteristics
Weight
106 g
Average: 158.9 g
102 g
Average: 158.9 g
Thickness
13.9 mm
Average: 9.7 mm
12.5 mm
Average: 9.7 mm
Width
55.7 mm
Average: 71 mm
50 mm
Average: 71 mm
Height
116.5 mm
Average: 143.5 mm
114 mm
Average: 143.5 mm
Head SAR Radiation Level
The amount of electromagnetic wave energy absorbed by the tissues of the user's head when using the device.
2.1
max 2.79
Average: 0.7
1.34
max 2.79
Average: 0.7
3.5 mm jack
Analog audio jack that allows you to connect standard headphones, headsets, or other audio devices to your smartphone
Available
Available
SIM type
There are several types of SIM cards, including standard SIM, Micro SIM, Nano SIM, and eSIM. Micro SIM was designed for smaller devices and Nano SIM for even thinner and more compact smartphones. eSIM (embedded SIM) is an embedded electronic SIM module that does not require a physical card. Show more
Mini SIM
Mini SIM
Audio
3.5 mm jack
Analog audio jack that allows you to connect standard headphones, headsets, or other audio devices to your smartphone
Available
Available
FM receiver
It can work as an FM radio if you connect headphones.
Available
Available
Interfaces and communications
Bluetooth version
Each new version of Bluetooth has its own features and improvements over the previous version.
2.1
max 6
Average: 3.9
2.1
max 6
Average: 3.9
Entry 480
15
max 30
Average: 27.9
max 30
Average: 27.9
USB version
New versions are more convenient in power management, work faster
2
max 3.2
Average: 2.1
max 3.2
Average: 2.1
Wi-Fi
The device can work via Wi-Fi.
Available
Accelerometer
The accelerometer measures the linear acceleration of the device in space. It is needed to determine when the device changes from vertical to horizontal. Show more
Available
There is no data
Proximity sensor
The main purpose of the sensor is to automatically turn off the screen or block touch input when the smartphone is near the user's ear during a call or close to the face during a conversation. This prevents accidental touching or activation of functions during a call and improves usability. Show more
Available
Available

FAQ

How do Nokia Asha 302 and Nokia 301 perform in benchmarks?

According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia Asha 302 scored There is no data points. Nokia 301 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.

What camera do smartphones have?

Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia Asha 302 3 MP, versus 3 MP for Nokia 301.

The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of There is no data MP, versus There is no data MP of the second.

Which accumulator is better for Nokia Asha 302 or Nokia 301?

The battery capacity of Nokia Asha 302 is 1320 mAh, versus 1200 for Nokia 301.

What kind of memory?

As for the built-in memory, it is 0.1 GB for the first device, and 0.25 GB for the second.

What screen do smartphones have

The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a TFT matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.

Which processor is better - Nokia Asha 302 or Nokia 301?

Nokia Asha 302 has There is no data on board, the other has There is no data.

What is the screen resolution?

The display resolution of Nokia Asha 302 is 2.4 inches, versus 2.4 inches for Nokia 301.

How much do they weigh?

Nokia Asha 302 weighs 106 grams, versus 102 grams for Nokia 301.

How many SIM cards are supported?

The first smartphone can support up to There is no data, versus 2 for the second.

When did the sales start?

Nokia Asha 302 was announced in There is no data. Nokia 301 in There is no data.

What operating system version are you using?

Nokia Asha 302 There is no data has the Android version, Nokia 301 There is no data has the Android version.

How much memory can be installed on smartphones?

Nokia Asha 302 supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Nokia 301 up to There is no data GB.

What kind of moisture protection?

IPThere is no data of Nokia Asha 302 versus IPThere is no data of Nokia 301.