![Nokia 216](/upload/iblock/075/Frame-2.jpg)
![Nokia Asha 310](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/d42/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
Comparision Nokia 216 vs Nokia Asha 310
Grade
Top specs and features
Main camera resolution
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Display size
RAM
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Nokia 216 scored There is no data points. Nokia Asha 310 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 216 0.3 MP, versus 2 MP for Nokia Asha 310. Main camera aperture at Nokia 216 f/There is no data. At Nokia Asha 310 aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a There is no data flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is 0.3 MP vs. There is no data MP for Nokia Asha 310. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Nokia 216 has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. There is no data is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Nokia 216 has 0.016 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Nokia Asha 310 is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the There is no data kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 0.06 GB of RAM. RAM version for Nokia Asha 310 DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 216 scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Nokia Asha 310 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Nokia 216 installed TFT screen matrix. The display resolution is 2.4 inches. The pixel density reaches 166dpi screen.
Nokia 216's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Nokia Asha 310 has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 3 inches. Here the pixel density is 155 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Nokia 216 came out in There is no data. Nokia Asha 310 submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Nokia 216 supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for Nokia Asha 310.
Nokia 216 weighs 83 grams, versus 104 grams for Nokia Asha 310. The thickness of the first smartphone is 13.5 mm, versus 13 mm for the second one.
Nokia 216 has USB version 1.1 and Nokia Asha 310 has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running There is no data version of Android. The second device has the There is no data version of Android installed. Nokia 216 is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Nokia Asha 310 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Nokia Asha 310 is better than Nokia 216
- Pixel density per screen inch 166 ppi против 155 ppi, more on 7%
- Weight 83 g против 104 g, less by -20%
Nokia 216 vs Nokia Asha 310: highlights
![Nokia 216](/upload/iblock/075/Frame-2.jpg)
![Nokia Asha 310](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/d42/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Nokia 216 and Nokia Asha 310 perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 216 scored There is no data points. Nokia Asha 310 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 216 0.3 MP, versus 2 MP for Nokia Asha 310.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of 0.3 MP, versus There is no data MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Nokia 216 or Nokia Asha 310?
The battery capacity of Nokia 216 is 1020 mAh, versus 1110 for Nokia Asha 310.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is There is no data GB for the first device, and 0.01 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a TFT matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.
Which processor is better - Nokia 216 or Nokia Asha 310?
Nokia 216 has There is no data on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Nokia 216 is 2.4 inches, versus 3 inches for Nokia Asha 310.
How much do they weigh?
Nokia 216 weighs 83 grams, versus 104 grams for Nokia Asha 310.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.
When did the sales start?
Nokia 216 was announced in There is no data. Nokia Asha 310 in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Nokia 216 There is no data has the Android version, Nokia Asha 310 There is no data has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Nokia 216 supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Nokia Asha 310 up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Nokia 216 versus IPThere is no data of Nokia Asha 310.