Comparision Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 vs Samsung Galaxy W
Grade
Top specs and features
Main camera resolution
Android Version
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Display size
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 scored There is no data points. Samsung Galaxy W scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 8 MP, versus 8 MP for Samsung Galaxy W. Main camera aperture at Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 f/There is no data. At Samsung Galaxy W aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a LED flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is 5 MP vs. 2 MP for Samsung Galaxy W. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 has the MediaTek MT6580 chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. Mali-400MP2 is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches 500 MHz. Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 has 1 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Samsung Galaxy W is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the There is no data kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 1.5 GB of RAM. RAM version for Samsung Galaxy W DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Samsung Galaxy W scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 installed IPS LCD screen matrix. The display resolution is 5.5 inches. The pixel density reaches 267dpi screen.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Samsung Galaxy W has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 7 inches. Here the pixel density is 210 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 came out in There is no data. Samsung Galaxy W submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 supports up to 2 sim cards, versus There is no data for Samsung Galaxy W.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 weighs 144 grams, versus 245 grams for Samsung Galaxy W. The thickness of the first smartphone is There is no data mm, versus 8.8 mm for the second one.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 has USB version 2 and Samsung Galaxy W has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running 6 version of Android. The second device has the 4.3 version of Android installed. Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Samsung Galaxy W supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 is better than Samsung Galaxy W
- Android Version 6 против 4.3 , more on 40%
- Pixel density per screen inch 267 ppi против 210 ppi, more on 27%
- Front camera resolution 5 MP против 2 MP, more on 150%
- Weight 144 g против 245 g, less by -41%
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 vs Samsung Galaxy W: highlights
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 and Samsung Galaxy W perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 scored There is no data points. Samsung Galaxy W scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 8 MP, versus 8 MP for Samsung Galaxy W.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of 5 MP, versus 2 MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 or Samsung Galaxy W?
The battery capacity of Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 is 2500 mAh, versus 3200 for Samsung Galaxy W.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 16 GB for the first device, and 16 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a IPS LCD matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.
Which processor is better - Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 or Samsung Galaxy W?
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 has MediaTek MT6580 on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 is 5.5 inches, versus 7 inches for Samsung Galaxy W.
How much do they weigh?
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 weighs 144 grams, versus 245 grams for Samsung Galaxy W.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus There is no data for the second.
When did the sales start?
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 was announced in There is no data. Samsung Galaxy W in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 6 has the Android version, Samsung Galaxy W 4.3 has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Samsung Galaxy W up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 versus IPThere is no data of Samsung Galaxy W.