![Sharp Aquos Crystal X](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/741/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
![Nokia Lumia 510](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/bdc/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
Comparision Sharp Aquos Crystal X vs Nokia Lumia 510
Grade
Top specs and features
AnTuTu
Main camera resolution
Android Version
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Sharp Aquos Crystal X scored There is no data points. Nokia Lumia 510 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Sharp Aquos Crystal X 13 MP, versus 5 MP for Nokia Lumia 510. Main camera aperture at Sharp Aquos Crystal X f/There is no data. At Nokia Lumia 510 aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a There is no data flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is There is no data MP vs. There is no data MP for Nokia Lumia 510. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Sharp Aquos Crystal X has the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801AB chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. Qualcomm Adreno 330 is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches 600 MHz. Sharp Aquos Crystal X has 2 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDR3.
Nokia Lumia 510 is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the Adreno 200 kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 0.25 GB of RAM. RAM version for Nokia Lumia 510 DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Sharp Aquos Crystal X scored 49735 points out of 911349 points possible. Nokia Lumia 510 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Sharp Aquos Crystal X installed LCD screen matrix. The display resolution is 5.5 inches. The pixel density reaches 420dpi screen.
Sharp Aquos Crystal X's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Nokia Lumia 510 has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 4 inches. Here the pixel density is 233 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Sharp Aquos Crystal X came out in There is no data. Nokia Lumia 510 submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Sharp Aquos Crystal X supports up to 1 sim cards, versus There is no data for Nokia Lumia 510.
Sharp Aquos Crystal X weighs 157 grams, versus 129 grams for Nokia Lumia 510. The thickness of the first smartphone is 11 mm, versus 11.5 mm for the second one.
Sharp Aquos Crystal X has USB version There is no data and Nokia Lumia 510 has got There is no data USB version. The first smartphone is running 5 version of Android. The second device has the There is no data version of Android installed. Sharp Aquos Crystal X is capable of supporting the 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi version. Nokia Lumia 510 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Sharp Aquos Crystal X is better than Nokia Lumia 510
- Main camera resolution 13 MP против 5 MP, more on 160%
- Battery capacity 2610 mAh против 1300 mAh, more on 101%
- Pixel density per screen inch 420 ppi против 233 ppi, more on 80%
- Display size 5.5 " против 4 ", more on 38%
- RAM 2 GB против 0.25 GB, more on 700%
- Cumulative memory 32 против 4 , more on 700%
Sharp Aquos Crystal X vs Nokia Lumia 510: highlights
![Sharp Aquos Crystal X](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/741/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
![Nokia Lumia 510](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/bdc/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Sharp Aquos Crystal X and Nokia Lumia 510 perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Sharp Aquos Crystal X scored 49735 points. Nokia Lumia 510 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Sharp Aquos Crystal X 13 MP, versus 5 MP for Nokia Lumia 510.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of There is no data MP, versus There is no data MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Sharp Aquos Crystal X or Nokia Lumia 510?
The battery capacity of Sharp Aquos Crystal X is 2610 mAh, versus 1300 for Nokia Lumia 510.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 32 GB for the first device, and 4 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a LCD matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.
Which processor is better - Sharp Aquos Crystal X or Nokia Lumia 510?
Sharp Aquos Crystal X has Qualcomm Snapdragon 801AB on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Sharp Aquos Crystal X is 5.5 inches, versus 4 inches for Nokia Lumia 510.
How much do they weigh?
Sharp Aquos Crystal X weighs 157 grams, versus 129 grams for Nokia Lumia 510.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 1, versus There is no data for the second.
When did the sales start?
Sharp Aquos Crystal X was announced in There is no data. Nokia Lumia 510 in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Sharp Aquos Crystal X 5 has the Android version, Nokia Lumia 510 There is no data has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Sharp Aquos Crystal X supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Nokia Lumia 510 up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Sharp Aquos Crystal X versus IPThere is no data of Nokia Lumia 510.