Main Page / Smartphones / Comparision Lenovo K3 vs Nokia Asha 305
Nokia Asha 305 Nokia Asha 305
Lenovo K3 Lenovo K3
VS

Comparision Nokia Asha 305 vs Lenovo K3

Nokia Asha 305

Nokia Asha 305

Rating: 4 points
Lenovo K3

WINNER
Lenovo K3

Rating: 14 points
Grade
Nokia Asha 305
Lenovo K3
Performance
0
0
Display
2
5
Camera
0
1
Battery
1
1
Other
1
3
Main characteristics
6
5
Audio
10
10
Interfaces and communications
2
6

Top specs and features

Main camera resolution

Nokia Asha 305: 2 MP Lenovo K3: 8 MP

Battery capacity

Nokia Asha 305: 1110 mAh Lenovo K3: 2300 mAh

Pixel density per screen inch

Nokia Asha 305: 156 ppi Lenovo K3: 295 ppi

Display size

Nokia Asha 305: 3 " Lenovo K3: 5 "

RAM

Nokia Asha 305: 0.3 GB Lenovo K3: 1 GB

Description

Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Nokia Asha 305 scored There is no data points. Lenovo K3 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.

Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia Asha 305 2 MP, versus 8 MP for Lenovo K3. Main camera aperture at Nokia Asha 305 f/There is no data. At Lenovo K3 aperture reaches f/2.2. The first smartphone has a There is no data flash, the second one has a LED flash.

The resolution of the front camera for the first device is There is no data MP vs. 2 MP for Lenovo K3. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.

Performance comparison. Nokia Asha 305 has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. There is no data is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Nokia Asha 305 has 0.3 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.

Lenovo K3 is equipped with Qualcomm Snapdragon 410v2. The processor frequency is 1.4 GHz. In terms of graphics, the Qualcomm Adreno 306 kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to 450 MHz. The machine is equipped with 1 GB of RAM. RAM version for Lenovo K3 DDRThere is no data.

Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia Asha 305 scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Lenovo K3 scored 20887 on AnTuTu.

Comparison of displays. On board Nokia Asha 305 installed TFT screen matrix. The display resolution is 3 inches. The pixel density reaches 156dpi screen.

Nokia Asha 305's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².

Lenovo K3 has a IPS LCD matrix with a diagonal of 5 inches. Here the pixel density is 295 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².

Equipment and general characteristics. Nokia Asha 305 came out in There is no data. Lenovo K3 submitted There is no data.

The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.

Nokia Asha 305 supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for Lenovo K3.

Nokia Asha 305 weighs 98 grams, versus 128 grams for Lenovo K3. The thickness of the first smartphone is 12.8 mm, versus 7.9 mm for the second one.

Nokia Asha 305 has USB version There is no data and Lenovo K3 has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running There is no data version of Android. The second device has the 4.4 version of Android installed. Nokia Asha 305 is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Lenovo K3 supports the 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi version.

The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.

Why Lenovo K3 is better than Nokia Asha 305

  • Weight 98 g против 128 g, less by -23%

Nokia Asha 305 vs Lenovo K3: highlights

Nokia Asha 305
Nokia Asha 305
Lenovo K3
Lenovo K3
Performance
RAM
The more RAM you have, the more apps and processes you can run at the same time without lag or performance degradation.
0.3 GB
max 18
Average: 2.8 GB
1 GB
max 18
Average: 2.8 GB
Processor configuration
1 ядро 1 GHz
4 ядра по 1.2
Memory card
microSDHC
microSDHC
Cumulative memory
0.64
max 1024
Average:
16
max 1024
Average:
Display
Pixel density per screen inch
The higher the density of pixels per inch, the sharper and more detailed the image will be displayed on the screen. The high pixel density creates smoother edges and sharper details. Show more
156 ppi
max 848
Average: 296.2 ppi
295 ppi
max 848
Average: 296.2 ppi
Display size
Image perception depends on the screen size. The bigger, the better.
3 "
max 10.1
Average: 5.1 "
5 "
max 10.1
Average: 5.1 "
Screen resolution
The higher the screen resolution, the more detailed and clear the image can be seen. However, screen resolution is not the only factor affecting image quality. Factors such as screen type, brightness, contrast, and color reproduction are also important. Show more
240 x 400 px
720 x 1280
Screen Matrix
There are various types of screen matrices such as IPS, AMOLED, TFT and others. IPS screens provide wide viewing angles and good color accuracy. AMOLED screens have richer colors, deeper blacks and lower power consumption. TFT screens usually offer a more affordable price but may have limited viewing angles and less accurate color reproduction. Show more
TFT
IPS LCD
Aspect Ratio
5:3
16:09
Camera
Main camera resolution
The higher the resolution of the main camera, the more detailed and clear photos and videos can be. However, resolution is not the only factor affecting image quality. Optics quality, pixel size, light sensitivity and other factors are also important. Show more
2 MP
max 200
Average: 14.2 MP
8 MP
max 200
Average: 14.2 MP
Video recording (main camera)
240 x 10
Battery
Battery capacity
The larger the battery capacity, the longer the smartphone can work without recharging.
1110 mAh
max 22000
Average: 3090.7 mAh
2300 mAh
max 22000
Average: 3090.7 mAh
Removable battery
Available
Available
Talk time
14
max 97
Average: 12.4
34
max 97
Average: 12.4
Standby time
22
max 75
Average: 17.4
24
max 75
Average: 17.4
Other
Main characteristics
Weight
98 g
Average: 158.9 g
128 g
Average: 158.9 g
Thickness
12.8 mm
Average: 9.7 mm
7.9 mm
Average: 9.7 mm
Width
53.8 mm
Average: 71 mm
70.5 mm
Average: 71 mm
Height
110.3 mm
Average: 143.5 mm
141 mm
Average: 143.5 mm
Head SAR Radiation Level
The amount of electromagnetic wave energy absorbed by the tissues of the user's head when using the device.
1.18
max 2.79
Average: 0.7
max 2.79
Average: 0.7
3.5 mm jack
Analog audio jack that allows you to connect standard headphones, headsets, or other audio devices to your smartphone
Available
Available
SIM type
There are several types of SIM cards, including standard SIM, Micro SIM, Nano SIM, and eSIM. Micro SIM was designed for smaller devices and Nano SIM for even thinner and more compact smartphones. eSIM (embedded SIM) is an embedded electronic SIM module that does not require a physical card. Show more
Mini SIM
Micro SIM
Audio
3.5 mm jack
Analog audio jack that allows you to connect standard headphones, headsets, or other audio devices to your smartphone
Available
Available
FM receiver
It can work as an FM radio if you connect headphones.
Available
Available
Interfaces and communications
Bluetooth version
Each new version of Bluetooth has its own features and improvements over the previous version.
2.1
max 6
Average: 3.9
4
max 6
Average: 3.9
Number of SIM cards
2
max 2
Average: 1.9
2
max 2
Average: 1.9
Accelerometer
The accelerometer measures the linear acceleration of the device in space. It is needed to determine when the device changes from vertical to horizontal. Show more
Available
Available
Proximity sensor
The main purpose of the sensor is to automatically turn off the screen or block touch input when the smartphone is near the user's ear during a call or close to the face during a conversation. This prevents accidental touching or activation of functions during a call and improves usability. Show more
Available
Available

FAQ

How do Nokia Asha 305 and Lenovo K3 perform in benchmarks?

According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia Asha 305 scored There is no data points. Lenovo K3 scored 20887 on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.

What camera do smartphones have?

Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia Asha 305 2 MP, versus 8 MP for Lenovo K3.

The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of There is no data MP, versus 2 MP of the second.

Which accumulator is better for Nokia Asha 305 or Lenovo K3?

The battery capacity of Nokia Asha 305 is 1110 mAh, versus 2300 for Lenovo K3.

What kind of memory?

As for the built-in memory, it is 0.64 GB for the first device, and 16 GB for the second.

What screen do smartphones have

The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a TFT matrix, the second with a IPS LCD matrix.

Which processor is better - Nokia Asha 305 or Lenovo K3?

Nokia Asha 305 has There is no data on board, the other has Qualcomm Snapdragon 410v2.

What is the screen resolution?

The display resolution of Nokia Asha 305 is 3 inches, versus 5 inches for Lenovo K3.

How much do they weigh?

Nokia Asha 305 weighs 98 grams, versus 128 grams for Lenovo K3.

How many SIM cards are supported?

The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.

When did the sales start?

Nokia Asha 305 was announced in There is no data. Lenovo K3 in There is no data.

What operating system version are you using?

Nokia Asha 305 There is no data has the Android version, Lenovo K3 4.4 has the Android version.

How much memory can be installed on smartphones?

Nokia Asha 305 supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Lenovo K3 up to There is no data GB.

What kind of moisture protection?

IPThere is no data of Nokia Asha 305 versus IPThere is no data of Lenovo K3.

Smartphones