Comparision Blu Studio Energy vs Micromax Q372 Unite 3
Grade
Top specs and features
Main camera resolution
Android Version
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Display size
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Blu Studio Energy scored There is no data points. Micromax Q372 Unite 3 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Blu Studio Energy 8 MP, versus 8 MP for Micromax Q372 Unite 3. Main camera aperture at Blu Studio Energy f/There is no data. At Micromax Q372 Unite 3 aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a LED flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is 2 MP vs. 2 MP for Micromax Q372 Unite 3. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Blu Studio Energy has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. Mali-400 is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Blu Studio Energy has 1 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Micromax Q372 Unite 3 is equipped with MediaTek MT6582M. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the Mali-400MP2 kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to 500 MHz. The machine is equipped with 1 GB of RAM. RAM version for Micromax Q372 Unite 3 DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Blu Studio Energy scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Micromax Q372 Unite 3 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Blu Studio Energy installed IPS LCD screen matrix. The display resolution is 5 inches. The pixel density reaches 295dpi screen.
Blu Studio Energy's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Micromax Q372 Unite 3 has a IPS LCD matrix with a diagonal of 4.7 inches. Here the pixel density is 200 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Blu Studio Energy came out in There is no data. Micromax Q372 Unite 3 submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Blu Studio Energy supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for Micromax Q372 Unite 3.
Blu Studio Energy weighs 180 grams, versus There is no data grams for Micromax Q372 Unite 3. The thickness of the first smartphone is 10.4 mm, versus There is no data mm for the second one.
Blu Studio Energy has USB version 2 and Micromax Q372 Unite 3 has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running 4.4 version of Android. The second device has the 5 version of Android installed. Blu Studio Energy is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Micromax Q372 Unite 3 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Blu Studio Energy is better than Micromax Q372 Unite 3
- Battery capacity 5000 mAh против 2000 mAh, more on 150%
- Pixel density per screen inch 295 ppi против 200 ppi, more on 48%
- Display size 5 " против 4.7 ", more on 6%
Blu Studio Energy vs Micromax Q372 Unite 3: highlights
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Blu Studio Energy and Micromax Q372 Unite 3 perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Blu Studio Energy scored There is no data points. Micromax Q372 Unite 3 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Blu Studio Energy 8 MP, versus 8 MP for Micromax Q372 Unite 3.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of 2 MP, versus 2 MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Blu Studio Energy or Micromax Q372 Unite 3?
The battery capacity of Blu Studio Energy is 5000 mAh, versus 2000 for Micromax Q372 Unite 3.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 8 GB for the first device, and 8 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a IPS LCD matrix, the second with a IPS LCD matrix.
Which processor is better - Blu Studio Energy or Micromax Q372 Unite 3?
Blu Studio Energy has There is no data on board, the other has MediaTek MT6582M.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Blu Studio Energy is 5 inches, versus 4.7 inches for Micromax Q372 Unite 3.
How much do they weigh?
Blu Studio Energy weighs 180 grams, versus There is no data grams for Micromax Q372 Unite 3.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.
When did the sales start?
Blu Studio Energy was announced in There is no data. Micromax Q372 Unite 3 in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Blu Studio Energy 4.4 has the Android version, Micromax Q372 Unite 3 5 has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Blu Studio Energy supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Micromax Q372 Unite 3 up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Blu Studio Energy versus IPThere is no data of Micromax Q372 Unite 3.