Comparision Samsung S5230 Star vs Samsung Galaxy S3 mini
Grade
Top specs and features
Main camera resolution
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Display size
RAM
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Samsung S5230 Star scored There is no data points. Samsung Galaxy S3 mini scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Samsung S5230 Star 3 MP, versus 5 MP for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini. Main camera aperture at Samsung S5230 Star f/There is no data. At Samsung Galaxy S3 mini aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a There is no data flash, the second one has a LED flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is There is no data MP vs. 0.3 MP for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Samsung S5230 Star has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. There is no data is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Samsung S5230 Star has 0.1 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Samsung Galaxy S3 mini is equipped with ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8500. The processor frequency is 1 GHz. In terms of graphics, the ARM Mali-400 MP kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 1 GB of RAM. RAM version for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Samsung S5230 Star scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Samsung Galaxy S3 mini scored 9682 on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Samsung S5230 Star installed TFT screen matrix. The display resolution is 3 inches. The pixel density reaches 156dpi screen.
Samsung S5230 Star's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Samsung Galaxy S3 mini has a Super AMOLED matrix with a diagonal of 4 inches. Here the pixel density is 233 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Samsung S5230 Star came out in There is no data. Samsung Galaxy S3 mini submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Samsung S5230 Star supports up to There is no data sim cards, versus 1 for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini.
Samsung S5230 Star weighs 94 grams, versus 111 grams for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini. The thickness of the first smartphone is 11.9 mm, versus 10 mm for the second one.
Samsung S5230 Star has USB version There is no data and Samsung Galaxy S3 mini has got There is no data USB version. The first smartphone is running There is no data version of Android. The second device has the 4 version of Android installed. Samsung S5230 Star is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Samsung Galaxy S3 mini supports the 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Samsung Galaxy S3 mini is better than Samsung S5230 Star
- Weight 94 g против 111 g, less by -15%
Samsung S5230 Star vs Samsung Galaxy S3 mini: highlights
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Samsung S5230 Star and Samsung Galaxy S3 mini perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Samsung S5230 Star scored There is no data points. Samsung Galaxy S3 mini scored 9682 on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Samsung S5230 Star 3 MP, versus 5 MP for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of There is no data MP, versus 0.3 MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Samsung S5230 Star or Samsung Galaxy S3 mini?
The battery capacity of Samsung S5230 Star is 1000 mAh, versus 1500 for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 0.1 GB for the first device, and 16 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a TFT matrix, the second with a Super AMOLED matrix.
Which processor is better - Samsung S5230 Star or Samsung Galaxy S3 mini?
Samsung S5230 Star has There is no data on board, the other has ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8500.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Samsung S5230 Star is 3 inches, versus 4 inches for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini.
How much do they weigh?
Samsung S5230 Star weighs 94 grams, versus 111 grams for Samsung Galaxy S3 mini.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to There is no data, versus 1 for the second.
When did the sales start?
Samsung S5230 Star was announced in There is no data. Samsung Galaxy S3 mini in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Samsung S5230 Star There is no data has the Android version, Samsung Galaxy S3 mini 4 has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Samsung S5230 Star supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Samsung Galaxy S3 mini up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Samsung S5230 Star versus IPThere is no data of Samsung Galaxy S3 mini.