MediaTek Helio X27 MediaTek Helio X27
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
VS

Comparision MediaTek Helio X27 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

MediaTek Helio X27

MediaTek Helio X27

Rating: 10 points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

WINNER
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Rating: 72 points
Grade
MediaTek Helio X27
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Interfaces and communications
0
9
Memory specification
1
5
Performance
1
10
Benchmark tests
1
6

Top specs and features

AnTuTu test score

MediaTek Helio X27: 97013 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: 628740

Memory frequency

MediaTek Helio X27: 800 MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: 2750 MHz

4G support

MediaTek Helio X27: Available Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: Available

Technological process

MediaTek Helio X27: 16 nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: 7 nm

GPU base clock

MediaTek Helio X27: 880 MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: 587 MHz

Description

MediaTek Helio X27 - 10 - core processor, clocked at 1600 GHz. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 is equipped with 8 cores clocked at 2840 MHz. The maximum frequency of the first processor is There is no data GHz. The second is capable of overclocking to 2.84 GHz.

MediaTek Helio X27 consumes There is no data Watt and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 10 Watt.

As for the graphics core. MediaTek Helio X27 is equipped with There is no data. The second uses Adreno 650. The first operates at a frequency of 880 MHz. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 operates at 587 MHz.

Regarding processor memory. MediaTek Helio X27 may support DDR3. The maximum memory capacity is 4 GB. And its throughput is There is no data GB/s. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 works with DDR5. The maximum amount of memory can be 16. At the same time, the throughput reaches 44 GB/s

Let's move on to performance testing in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, MediaTek Helio X27 scored 97013 points out of 988414 possible points. In the GeekBench 5 (Multi-Core) benchmark, it scored 1146 points out of a possible 16511 points. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 in Antutu received 628740 points. And GeekBench 5 (Multi-Core) scored 3304 points .

Results.

Why Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 is better than MediaTek Helio X27

  • GPU base clock 880 MHz против 587 MHz, more on 50%
  • Number of threads 10 против 8 , more on 25%

MediaTek Helio X27 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: highlights

MediaTek Helio X27
MediaTek Helio X27
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Interfaces and communications
eMMC version
standard flash memory format that is integrated directly into the SoC. Newer versions of eMMC provide faster data transfer speeds, faster app loading, and better overall device performance. Show more
5.1
max 5.1
Average: 2.7
3.1
max 5.1
Average: 2.7
VC-1
A video compression standard that provides a high compression ratio and supports various resolutions and bit rates.
Not available
There is no data
AVC
Not available
There is no data
JPEG
Supports an image compression format that is widely used for photographs and graphics.
Available
There is no data
ECC
Error correction technology that helps detect and correct memory errors resulting from random interference or malfunctions.
Not available
There is no data
4G support
LTE is located on a system on a chip (SoC). Built-in cellular-type LTE allows you to download much faster than older 3G technologies.
Available
Available
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.
Not available
Available
Memory specification
Memory frequency
RAM may be faster to increase system performance.
800 MHz
max 7500
Average: 1701 MHz
2750 MHz
max 7500
Average: 1701 MHz
Max. Memory
The largest amount of RAM memory.
4 GB
max 64
Average: 17.1 GB
16 GB
max 64
Average: 17.1 GB
Max. number of memory channels
The more their number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor
2
max 8
Average: 2.1
4
max 8
Average: 2.1
RAM version (DDR)
Indicates the type and speed of RAM used to temporarily store data and perform tasks on the device. Newer versions of DDR, such as DDR4 or DDR5, provide faster data transfer rates and better overall system performance. Show more
3
max 5
Average: 3.5
5
max 5
Average: 3.5
Performance
Number of Cores
The more cores, the more parallel tasks can be completed in a shorter time. This improves productivity and multitasking quickly, such as launching applications, performing calculations, and more. Show more
10
max 16
Average: 6.4
8
max 16
Average: 6.4
GPU shaders
Refers to the parts of the GPU that are responsible for processing graphics and effects. The more shader units in the GPU, the higher the performance and graphics capabilities. Show more
64
max 1536
Average: 122.4
512
max 1536
Average: 122.4
CPU base frequency
The base frequency of a processor in mobile processors (SoCs) indicates its default operating frequency when the load on the processor does not require increased performance. The base frequency determines the base speed of the processor and affects the overall performance of the device. Show more
1600 MHz
max 3200
Average: 922.4 MHz
2840 MHz
max 3200
Average: 922.4 MHz
Hyper-threading
A technology that allows a single physical processor to execute multiple threads of tasks at the same time.
Not available
Not available
64-bit
The processor supports data and instruction processing with 64-bit width. This allows you to process more data and perform more complex calculations compared to 32-bit processors. Show more
Available
Available
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor will be, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
10
max 24
Average: 5.7
8
max 24
Average: 5.7
Multiplier Unlocked
Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, thanks to which they work faster and improve the quality in games and other applications.
Not available
Not available
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
121 TFLOPS
max 2272
Average: 262.9 TFLOPS
1298 TFLOPS
max 2272
Average: 262.9 TFLOPS
Benchmark tests
AnTuTu test score
AnTuTu is a popular mobile benchmark that is used to evaluate the performance and compare various aspects of mobile processors and systems on a chip (SoC). Show more
97013
max 988414
Average: 324226.4
628740
max 988414
Average: 324226.4
GeekBench 5 Single-Core score
The result of testing the performance of the processor in single-threaded mode using the GeekBench 5 benchmark. It measures the performance of a single processor core when performing various tasks. Show more
336
max 1986
Average: 490.3
981
max 1986
Average: 490.3
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core test score
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a benchmark that measures the multi-threaded performance of mobile processors and systems on a chip (SoC). The higher the value of this indicator, the more powerful the processor and the better it copes with the execution of several tasks at the same time. Show more
1146
max 16511
Average: 1759.3
3304
max 16511
Average: 1759.3

FAQ

How many points does MediaTek Helio X27 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 score in benchmarks?

In the Antutu benchmark, MediaTek Helio X27 scored 97013 points. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 scored 628740 points.

How many cores does the processor have?

MediaTek Helio X27 has 10 cores. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 has 8 cores.

Does the processor support NAVIC?

MediaTek Helio X27 There is no data.

How many transistors are there in processors?

MediaTek Helio X27 has There is no data million transistors. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 has There is no data million transistors.

What GPU is installed on MediaTek Helio X27 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865?

MediaTek Helio X27 uses There is no data. Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 has graphics core Adreno 650 installed.

How fast are the processors?

MediaTek Helio X27 is clocked at 1600 MHz. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 operates at 2840 MHz.

What kind of RAM is supported?

MediaTek Helio X27 supports DDR3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 supports DDR5.

What is the maximum frequency of processors?

MediaTek Helio X27 has a maximum frequency of There is no data Hz. The maximum frequency for Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 reaches 2.84 GHz.

How much energy do they consume?

The power consumption of MediaTek Helio X27 can be up to There is no data Watts. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 has up to There is no data Watts.