![Nokia 2.3](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/1fa/340_345_0/PHONE_124536.jpeg)
![Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830](/upload/iblock/811/Frame-2.jpg)
Comparision Nokia 2.3 vs Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830
Grade
Top specs and features
AnTuTu
Main camera resolution
Android Version
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Nokia 2.3 scored There is no data points. Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 2.3 13 MP, versus 5 MP for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830. Main camera aperture at Nokia 2.3 f/2.2. At Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 aperture reaches f/2.6. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a LED flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is 5 MP vs. There is no data MP for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/2.4 versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Nokia 2.3 has the MediaTek Helio A22 chip installed. The processor frequency reaches 2 GHz. IMG PowerVR GE-class GPU is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches 650 MHz. Nokia 2.3 has 2 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches 6. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the Adreno 200 kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 0.27 GB of RAM. RAM version for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 2.3 scored 57866 points out of 911349 points possible. Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Nokia 2.3 installed IPS LCD screen matrix. The display resolution is 6.2 inches. The pixel density reaches 269dpi screen.
Nokia 2.3's screen refresh rate is 60 Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches 496 cd/m².
Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 3.5 inches. Here the pixel density is 166 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Nokia 2.3 came out in There is no data. Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Nokia 2.3 supports up to 2 sim cards, versus There is no data for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830.
Nokia 2.3 weighs 183 grams, versus 113 grams for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830. The thickness of the first smartphone is 8.7 mm, versus 11.5 mm for the second one.
Nokia 2.3 has USB version 2 and Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 has got There is no data USB version. The first smartphone is running 9 version of Android. The second device has the 2.3 version of Android installed. Nokia 2.3 is capable of supporting the 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi version. Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to 512 GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Nokia 2.3 is better than Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830
- Main camera resolution 13 MP против 5 MP, more on 160%
- Android Version 9 против 2.3 , more on 291%
- Battery capacity 4000 mAh против 1350 mAh, more on 196%
- Pixel density per screen inch 269 ppi против 166 ppi, more on 62%
- Display size 6.2 " против 3.5 ", more on 77%
- RAM 2 GB против 0.27 GB, more on 641%
- Cumulative memory 32 против 0.2 , more on 15900%
Nokia 2.3 vs Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830: highlights
![Nokia 2.3](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/1fa/340_345_0/PHONE_124536.jpeg)
![Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830](/upload/iblock/811/Frame-2.jpg)
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Nokia 2.3 and Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 2.3 scored 57866 points. Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
In Geekbench 5, Nokia 2.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 2.3 13 MP, versus 5 MP for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of 5 MP, versus There is no data MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Nokia 2.3 or Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830?
The battery capacity of Nokia 2.3 is 4000 mAh, versus 1350 for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 32 GB for the first device, and 0.2 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a IPS LCD matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.
Which processor is better - Nokia 2.3 or Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830?
Nokia 2.3 has MediaTek Helio A22 on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Nokia 2.3 is 6.2 inches, versus 3.5 inches for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830.
How much do they weigh?
Nokia 2.3 weighs 183 grams, versus 113 grams for Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus There is no data for the second.
When did the sales start?
Nokia 2.3 was announced in There is no data. Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Nokia 2.3 9 has the Android version, Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 2.3 has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Nokia 2.3 supports memory cards up to 512 GB and Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830 up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Nokia 2.3 versus IPThere is no data of Samsung Galaxy ACE S5830.
How much RAM is installed in smartphones?
Maximum RAM is 6 for Nokia 2.