Main Page / Smartphones / Comparision Nokia 130 (2017) vs OnePlus 3
Nokia 130 (2017) Nokia 130 (2017)
OnePlus 3 OnePlus 3
VS

Comparision Nokia 130 (2017) vs OnePlus 3

Nokia 130 (2017)

Nokia 130 (2017)

Rating: 3 points
OnePlus 3

WINNER
OnePlus 3

Rating: 42 points
Grade
Nokia 130 (2017)
OnePlus 3
Performance
0
1
Display
2
6
Camera
0
1
Battery
1
2
Other
0
5
Main characteristics
7
5
Audio
10
0
Interfaces and communications
2
8

Top specs and features

Main camera resolution

Nokia 130 (2017): 0.3 MP OnePlus 3: 16 MP

Battery capacity

Nokia 130 (2017): 1020 mAh OnePlus 3: 3000 mAh

Pixel density per screen inch

Nokia 130 (2017): 112 ppi OnePlus 3: 401 ppi

Display size

Nokia 130 (2017): 1.8 " OnePlus 3: 5.5 "

RAM

Nokia 130 (2017): 0.004 GB OnePlus 3: 6 GB

Description

Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Nokia 130 (2017) scored There is no data points. OnePlus 3 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.

Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 130 (2017) 0.3 MP, versus 16 MP for OnePlus 3. Main camera aperture at Nokia 130 (2017) f/There is no data. At OnePlus 3 aperture reaches f/2. The first smartphone has a There is no data flash, the second one has a LED flash.

The resolution of the front camera for the first device is There is no data MP vs. 8 MP for OnePlus 3. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/2 for the second.

Performance comparison. Nokia 130 (2017) has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. There is no data is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Nokia 130 (2017) has 0.004 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.

OnePlus 3 is equipped with Qualcomm Snapdragon 820. The processor frequency is 2.2 GHz. In terms of graphics, the Qualcomm Adreno 530 kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to 600 MHz. The machine is equipped with 6 GB of RAM. RAM version for OnePlus 3 DDR4.

Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 130 (2017) scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. OnePlus 3 scored 160351 on AnTuTu.

Comparison of displays. On board Nokia 130 (2017) installed TFT screen matrix. The display resolution is 1.8 inches. The pixel density reaches 112dpi screen.

Nokia 130 (2017)'s screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².

OnePlus 3 has a AMOLED matrix with a diagonal of 5.5 inches. Here the pixel density is 401 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².

Equipment and general characteristics. Nokia 130 (2017) came out in There is no data. OnePlus 3 submitted There is no data.

The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.

Nokia 130 (2017) supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for OnePlus 3.

Nokia 130 (2017) weighs 74 grams, versus 158 grams for OnePlus 3. The thickness of the first smartphone is 14.2 mm, versus 7.4 mm for the second one.

Nokia 130 (2017) has USB version 2 and OnePlus 3 has got There is no data USB version. The first smartphone is running There is no data version of Android. The second device has the 6 version of Android installed. Nokia 130 (2017) is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. OnePlus 3 supports the 802.11 a/b/g/ac Wi-Fi version.

The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.

Why OnePlus 3 is better than Nokia 130 (2017)

  • Weight 74 g против 158 g, less by -53%

Nokia 130 (2017) vs OnePlus 3: highlights

Nokia 130 (2017)
Nokia 130 (2017)
OnePlus 3
OnePlus 3
Performance
RAM
The more RAM you have, the more apps and processes you can run at the same time without lag or performance degradation.
0.004 GB
max 18
Average: 2.8 GB
6 GB
max 18
Average: 2.8 GB
Memory card
microSDHC
There is no data
Cumulative memory
0.008
max 1024
Average:
64
max 1024
Average:
Display
Pixel density per screen inch
The higher the density of pixels per inch, the sharper and more detailed the image will be displayed on the screen. The high pixel density creates smoother edges and sharper details. Show more
112 ppi
max 848
Average: 296.2 ppi
401 ppi
max 848
Average: 296.2 ppi
Display size
Image perception depends on the screen size. The bigger, the better.
1.8 "
max 10.1
Average: 5.1 "
5.5 "
max 10.1
Average: 5.1 "
Screen resolution
The higher the screen resolution, the more detailed and clear the image can be seen. However, screen resolution is not the only factor affecting image quality. Factors such as screen type, brightness, contrast, and color reproduction are also important. Show more
120 x 160 px
1080 x 1920
Screen Matrix
There are various types of screen matrices such as IPS, AMOLED, TFT and others. IPS screens provide wide viewing angles and good color accuracy. AMOLED screens have richer colors, deeper blacks and lower power consumption. TFT screens usually offer a more affordable price but may have limited viewing angles and less accurate color reproduction. Show more
TFT
AMOLED
Aspect Ratio
4:3
16:09
Camera
Main camera resolution
The higher the resolution of the main camera, the more detailed and clear photos and videos can be. However, resolution is not the only factor affecting image quality. Optics quality, pixel size, light sensitivity and other factors are also important. Show more
0.3 MP
max 200
Average: 14.2 MP
16 MP
max 200
Average: 14.2 MP
Battery
Battery type
One of the most common types is the lithium-ion (Li-Ion) battery.
Li-Ion
Li-Polymer
Battery capacity
The larger the battery capacity, the longer the smartphone can work without recharging.
1020 mAh
max 22000
Average: 3090.7 mAh
3000 mAh
max 22000
Average: 3090.7 mAh
Removable battery
Available
There is no data
Other
Main characteristics
Weight
74 g
Average: 158.9 g
158 g
Average: 158.9 g
Thickness
14.2 mm
Average: 9.7 mm
7.4 mm
Average: 9.7 mm
Width
48.4 mm
Average: 71 mm
74.7 mm
Average: 71 mm
Height
111.5 mm
Average: 143.5 mm
152.7 mm
Average: 143.5 mm
Head SAR Radiation Level
The amount of electromagnetic wave energy absorbed by the tissues of the user's head when using the device.
1.45
max 2.79
Average: 0.7
0.37
max 2.79
Average: 0.7
SAR radiation level for the body
The amount of electromagnetic wave energy absorbed by the tissues of the user's body when using the device.
1.49
max 97
Average: 1
0.29
max 97
Average: 1
3.5 mm jack
Analog audio jack that allows you to connect standard headphones, headsets, or other audio devices to your smartphone
Available
Available
SIM type
There are several types of SIM cards, including standard SIM, Micro SIM, Nano SIM, and eSIM. Micro SIM was designed for smaller devices and Nano SIM for even thinner and more compact smartphones. eSIM (embedded SIM) is an embedded electronic SIM module that does not require a physical card. Show more
Mini SIM
Nano SIM
Audio
3.5 mm jack
Analog audio jack that allows you to connect standard headphones, headsets, or other audio devices to your smartphone
Available
Available
FM receiver
It can work as an FM radio if you connect headphones.
Available
There is no data
Interfaces and communications
Bluetooth version
Each new version of Bluetooth has its own features and improvements over the previous version.
3
max 6
Average: 3.9
4.2
max 6
Average: 3.9
Number of SIM cards
2
max 2
Average: 1.9
2
max 2
Average: 1.9
USB version
New versions are more convenient in power management, work faster
2
max 3.2
Average: 2.1
max 3.2
Average: 2.1
Proximity sensor
The main purpose of the sensor is to automatically turn off the screen or block touch input when the smartphone is near the user's ear during a call or close to the face during a conversation. This prevents accidental touching or activation of functions during a call and improves usability. Show more
Available
Available

FAQ

How do Nokia 130 (2017) and OnePlus 3 perform in benchmarks?

According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 130 (2017) scored There is no data points. OnePlus 3 scored 160351 on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.

What camera do smartphones have?

Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 130 (2017) 0.3 MP, versus 16 MP for OnePlus 3.

The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of There is no data MP, versus 8 MP of the second.

Which accumulator is better for Nokia 130 (2017) or OnePlus 3?

The battery capacity of Nokia 130 (2017) is 1020 mAh, versus 3000 for OnePlus 3.

What kind of memory?

As for the built-in memory, it is 0.008 GB for the first device, and 64 GB for the second.

What screen do smartphones have

The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a TFT matrix, the second with a AMOLED matrix.

Which processor is better - Nokia 130 (2017) or OnePlus 3?

Nokia 130 (2017) has There is no data on board, the other has Qualcomm Snapdragon 820.

What is the screen resolution?

The display resolution of Nokia 130 (2017) is 1.8 inches, versus 5.5 inches for OnePlus 3.

How much do they weigh?

Nokia 130 (2017) weighs 74 grams, versus 158 grams for OnePlus 3.

How many SIM cards are supported?

The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.

When did the sales start?

Nokia 130 (2017) was announced in There is no data. OnePlus 3 in There is no data.

What operating system version are you using?

Nokia 130 (2017) There is no data has the Android version, OnePlus 3 6 has the Android version.

How much memory can be installed on smartphones?

Nokia 130 (2017) supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and OnePlus 3 up to There is no data GB.

What kind of moisture protection?

IPThere is no data of Nokia 130 (2017) versus IPThere is no data of OnePlus 3.

Smartphones