Nokia 220 4G
Nokia 130 (2017)
Comparision Nokia 220 4G vs Nokia 130 (2017)
Grade
Top specs and features
Main camera resolution
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Display size
RAM
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Nokia 220 4G scored There is no data points. Nokia 130 (2017) scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 220 4G 0.3 MP, versus 0.3 MP for Nokia 130 (2017). Main camera aperture at Nokia 220 4G f/There is no data. At Nokia 130 (2017) aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a There is no data flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is There is no data MP vs. There is no data MP for Nokia 130 (2017). As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Nokia 220 4G has the There is no data chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. There is no data is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Nokia 220 4G has 0.016 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Nokia 130 (2017) is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the There is no data kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 0.004 GB of RAM. RAM version for Nokia 130 (2017) DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 220 4G scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Nokia 130 (2017) scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Nokia 220 4G installed TFT screen matrix. The display resolution is 2.4 inches. The pixel density reaches 168dpi screen.
Nokia 220 4G's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Nokia 130 (2017) has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 1.8 inches. Here the pixel density is 112 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Nokia 220 4G came out in There is no data. Nokia 130 (2017) submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Nokia 220 4G supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for Nokia 130 (2017).
Nokia 220 4G weighs 87 grams, versus 74 grams for Nokia 130 (2017). The thickness of the first smartphone is 13.4 mm, versus 14.2 mm for the second one.
Nokia 220 4G has USB version 2 and Nokia 130 (2017) has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running There is no data version of Android. The second device has the There is no data version of Android installed. Nokia 220 4G is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Nokia 130 (2017) supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Nokia 220 4G is better than Nokia 130 (2017)
- Battery capacity 1200 mAh против 1020 mAh, more on 18%
- Pixel density per screen inch 168 ppi против 112 ppi, more on 50%
- Display size 2.4 " против 1.8 ", more on 33%
- RAM 0.016 GB против 0.004 GB, more on 300%
- Thickness 13.4 mm против 14.2 mm, less by -6%
- Bluetooth version 4.2 против 3 , more on 40%
Nokia 220 4G vs Nokia 130 (2017): highlights
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Nokia 220 4G and Nokia 130 (2017) perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Nokia 220 4G scored There is no data points. Nokia 130 (2017) scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Nokia 220 4G 0.3 MP, versus 0.3 MP for Nokia 130 (2017).
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of There is no data MP, versus There is no data MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Nokia 220 4G or Nokia 130 (2017)?
The battery capacity of Nokia 220 4G is 1200 mAh, versus 1020 for Nokia 130 (2017).
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is There is no data GB for the first device, and 0.008 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a TFT matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.
Which processor is better - Nokia 220 4G or Nokia 130 (2017)?
Nokia 220 4G has There is no data on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Nokia 220 4G is 2.4 inches, versus 1.8 inches for Nokia 130 (2017).
How much do they weigh?
Nokia 220 4G weighs 87 grams, versus 74 grams for Nokia 130 (2017).
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.
When did the sales start?
Nokia 220 4G was announced in There is no data. Nokia 130 (2017) in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Nokia 220 4G There is no data has the Android version, Nokia 130 (2017) There is no data has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Nokia 220 4G supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Nokia 130 (2017) up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Nokia 220 4G versus IPThere is no data of Nokia 130 (2017).
