Comparision Coolpad Note 3 Lite vs Lava A77
Grade
Top specs and features
Main camera resolution
Android Version
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Display size
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Coolpad Note 3 Lite scored There is no data points. Lava A77 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Coolpad Note 3 Lite 13 MP, versus 5 MP for Lava A77. Main camera aperture at Coolpad Note 3 Lite f/2. At Lava A77 aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a LED flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is 5 MP vs. 5 MP for Lava A77. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/There is no data versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Coolpad Note 3 Lite has the MediaTek MT6735 chip installed. The processor frequency reaches There is no data GHz. Mali-T720MP2 is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Coolpad Note 3 Lite has 3 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches There is no data. The RAM version is DDRThere is no data.
Lava A77 is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the Mali-400 kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 1 GB of RAM. RAM version for Lava A77 DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Coolpad Note 3 Lite scored There is no data points out of 911349 points possible. Lava A77 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Coolpad Note 3 Lite installed IPS LCD screen matrix. The display resolution is 5 inches. The pixel density reaches 296dpi screen.
Coolpad Note 3 Lite's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Lava A77 has a TN matrix with a diagonal of 4.5 inches. Here the pixel density is 219 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Coolpad Note 3 Lite came out in There is no data. Lava A77 submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Coolpad Note 3 Lite supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for Lava A77.
Coolpad Note 3 Lite weighs 142 grams, versus 140 grams for Lava A77. The thickness of the first smartphone is 8.9 mm, versus 9.5 mm for the second one.
Coolpad Note 3 Lite has USB version 2 and Lava A77 has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running 5.1 version of Android. The second device has the 6 version of Android installed. Coolpad Note 3 Lite is capable of supporting the There is no data Wi-Fi version. Lava A77 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Coolpad Note 3 Lite is better than Lava A77
- Main camera resolution 13 MP против 5 MP, more on 160%
- Battery capacity 2500 mAh против 2000 mAh, more on 25%
- Pixel density per screen inch 296 ppi против 219 ppi, more on 35%
- Display size 5 " против 4.5 ", more on 11%
- RAM 3 GB против 1 GB, more on 200%
- Cumulative memory 16 против 8 , more on 100%
Coolpad Note 3 Lite vs Lava A77: highlights
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Coolpad Note 3 Lite and Lava A77 perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Coolpad Note 3 Lite scored There is no data points. Lava A77 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Coolpad Note 3 Lite 13 MP, versus 5 MP for Lava A77.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of 5 MP, versus 5 MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Coolpad Note 3 Lite or Lava A77?
The battery capacity of Coolpad Note 3 Lite is 2500 mAh, versus 2000 for Lava A77.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 16 GB for the first device, and 8 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a IPS LCD matrix, the second with a TN matrix.
Which processor is better - Coolpad Note 3 Lite or Lava A77?
Coolpad Note 3 Lite has MediaTek MT6735 on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Coolpad Note 3 Lite is 5 inches, versus 4.5 inches for Lava A77.
How much do they weigh?
Coolpad Note 3 Lite weighs 142 grams, versus 140 grams for Lava A77.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.
When did the sales start?
Coolpad Note 3 Lite was announced in There is no data. Lava A77 in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Coolpad Note 3 Lite 5.1 has the Android version, Lava A77 6 has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Coolpad Note 3 Lite supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Lava A77 up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Coolpad Note 3 Lite versus IPThere is no data of Lava A77.