![Micromax in Note 1](/upload/iblock/956/bf6/Frame-2.jpg)
![Lava Flair Z1](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/514/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
Comparision Micromax in Note 1 vs Lava Flair Z1
Grade
Top specs and features
AnTuTu
Main camera resolution
Android Version
Battery capacity
Pixel density per screen inch
Description
Camera Comparison In DxOMark tests, Micromax in Note 1 scored There is no data points. Lava Flair Z1 scored There is no data in the DxOMark camera test.
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Micromax in Note 1 48 MP, versus 5 MP for Lava Flair Z1. Main camera aperture at Micromax in Note 1 f/1.79. At Lava Flair Z1 aperture reaches f/There is no data. The first smartphone has a LED flash, the second one has a LED flash.
The resolution of the front camera for the first device is 16 MP vs. 2 MP for Lava Flair Z1. As for aperture, the first smartphone has f/2 versus f/There is no data for the second.
Performance comparison. Micromax in Note 1 has the MediaTek Helio G85 chip installed. The processor frequency reaches 2 GHz. Arm Mali-G52 is responsible for graphics. The frequency of the graphics core reaches There is no data MHz. Micromax in Note 1 has 4 GB of RAM installed. The maximum amount of RAM for this model reaches 8. The RAM version is DDR4.
Lava Flair Z1 is equipped with There is no data. The processor frequency is There is no data GHz. In terms of graphics, the There is no data kernel is used here. The video core is capable of operating at a frequency of up to There is no data MHz. The machine is equipped with 1 GB of RAM. RAM version for Lava Flair Z1 DDRThere is no data.
Tests in benchmarks. In the AnTuTu benchmark, Micromax in Note 1 scored 200080 points out of 911349 points possible. Lava Flair Z1 scored There is no data on AnTuTu.
Comparison of displays. On board Micromax in Note 1 installed IPS LCD screen matrix. The display resolution is 6.7 inches. The pixel density reaches 269dpi screen.
Micromax in Note 1's screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the brightness of the display reaches There is no data cd/m².
Lava Flair Z1 has a TFT matrix with a diagonal of 7 inches. Here the pixel density is 195 ppi. The screen refresh rate is There is no data Hz. And the display brightness reaches There is no data cd/m².
Equipment and general characteristics. Micromax in Note 1 came out in There is no data. Lava Flair Z1 submitted There is no data.
The first smartphone has an IPThere is no data class of protection against dust and moisture, compared to the IPThere is no data class of the second device.
Micromax in Note 1 supports up to 2 sim cards, versus 2 for Lava Flair Z1.
Micromax in Note 1 weighs 196 grams, versus 160 grams for Lava Flair Z1. The thickness of the first smartphone is 9 mm, versus 8.9 mm for the second one.
Micromax in Note 1 has USB version 2 and Lava Flair Z1 has got 2 USB version. The first smartphone is running 10 version of Android. The second device has the 5 version of Android installed. Micromax in Note 1 is capable of supporting the 802.11 a/b/g/ac Wi-Fi version. Lava Flair Z1 supports the There is no data Wi-Fi version.
The first smartphone supports memory cards up to There is no data GB, the second up to There is no data GB.
Why Micromax in Note 1 is better than Lava Flair Z1
- Main camera resolution 48 MP против 5 MP, more on 860%
- Android Version 10 против 5 , more on 100%
- Battery capacity 5000 mAh против 2000 mAh, more on 150%
- Pixel density per screen inch 269 ppi против 195 ppi, more on 38%
- RAM 4 GB против 1 GB, more on 300%
- Cumulative memory 64 против 8 , more on 700%
Micromax in Note 1 vs Lava Flair Z1: highlights
![Micromax in Note 1](/upload/iblock/956/bf6/Frame-2.jpg)
![Lava Flair Z1](/upload/resize_cache/iblock/514/340_345_0/Bezymyannyy.jpg)
Performance
Display
Camera
Battery
Other
Main characteristics
Audio
Interfaces and communications
FAQ
How do Micromax in Note 1 and Lava Flair Z1 perform in benchmarks?
According to the AnTuTu benchmark, Micromax in Note 1 scored 200080 points. Lava Flair Z1 scored There is no data on AnTuTu test out of 911349 possible.
What camera do smartphones have?
Resolution of the main camera sensor for Micromax in Note 1 48 MP, versus 5 MP for Lava Flair Z1.
The front camera of the first smartphone received a resolution of 16 MP, versus 2 MP of the second.
Which accumulator is better for Micromax in Note 1 or Lava Flair Z1?
The battery capacity of Micromax in Note 1 is 5000 mAh, versus 2000 for Lava Flair Z1.
What kind of memory?
As for the built-in memory, it is 64 GB for the first device, and 8 GB for the second.
What screen do smartphones have
The screen of the first smartphone is equipped with a IPS LCD matrix, the second with a TFT matrix.
Which processor is better - Micromax in Note 1 or Lava Flair Z1?
Micromax in Note 1 has MediaTek Helio G85 on board, the other has There is no data.
What is the screen resolution?
The display resolution of Micromax in Note 1 is 6.7 inches, versus 7 inches for Lava Flair Z1.
How much do they weigh?
Micromax in Note 1 weighs 196 grams, versus 160 grams for Lava Flair Z1.
How many SIM cards are supported?
The first smartphone can support up to 2, versus 2 for the second.
When did the sales start?
Micromax in Note 1 was announced in There is no data. Lava Flair Z1 in There is no data.
What operating system version are you using?
Micromax in Note 1 10 has the Android version, Lava Flair Z1 5 has the Android version.
How much memory can be installed on smartphones?
Micromax in Note 1 supports memory cards up to There is no data GB and Lava Flair Z1 up to There is no data GB.
What kind of moisture protection?
IPThere is no data of Micromax in Note 1 versus IPThere is no data of Lava Flair Z1.